The collapse of Cameron’s chameleonic rhetoric is emblematic of the Tory’s broken rainbow.
David Cameron’s revealing interview with Gay Times is symbolic of the historical unease the Conservative Party has with the fight for equality particularly gay rights.
It is no secret that the Conservative Party have been on the wrong side of history on gay equality and have had to catch up with Labour and Lib Dems in order to attract socially liberal voters- including the ‘pink vote’.
Yet what Cameron’s interview reveals, is not that he is confused about his own lack of commitment for the fight of equality, but rather that he is in a muddle over which faction of his party he is currently trying appease while he attempts to lure new voters.
As a new poll by YouGov puts the Tory lead barely 4 points ahead of Labour, Cameron is relying more than ever on the morphing nature of his chameleonic language to reflect the political colours of the various spectrum voters he needs to seduce. Cameron knows that in order to secure even the smallest minority he will need the support of the old tory faithful as well as that of the so called ‘compassionate’ conservative.
Until recently Cameron has been able to employ the guise of a social liberal without the fear of losing political capital or votes. Yet tonight’s interview demonstrated now Cameron’s careful balancing act can quickly be toppled by even the most unsuspecting reporter. Cameron has already declared that he has no intention to further gay rights in the fight against discrimination and prejudice at home or abroad- thus appeasing the old order of his party and traditional voters. Switching colours, Cameron has also ‘bravely’ stood up in front of a gay pride to proclaim that he was wrong and sorry for section 28, luring social liberals to the new brand of ‘compassionate’ conservatism.
The question both traditional tories and ‘compassionate’ conservatives need to ask is how long David Cameron can continue to appease them both?
Cameron’s interview revealed that there is merely a pot of disappointment at the end of his broken rainbow. Social liberals and gay men and women who are tempted to vote for this compassionate conservative, should take a long hard look at David Cameron’s actions and rhetoric. It is not enough to agree in principle that gay rights are human rights and yet not have the courage to lead your party by these convictions. Cameron’s inability to condemn the actions of the Lithuanian Government is sadly part of his embryonic approach to gay rights that will inevitably destroy Gordon Brown’s fight for the recognition of civil partnerships in Europe.
Moreover, should Cameron fail to appease his party’s newly recruited ‘social liberals’ as well as his ever foreboding right flank , he risks sowing schismatic seeds in the currently tranquil field of compassionate conservatism.